Showing posts with label ovarian cancer research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ovarian cancer research. Show all posts

Friday, September 27, 2024

Early Clinical Investigators - crucial to ovarian cancer research

Last week, I was invited to speak about my advocacy work and my experience with ovarian cancer during the DOD Ovarian Cancer Academy . The Academy began in 2009 through the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program Ovarian Cancer Research Program (CDMRP  OCRP). Dr. Michael Seiden stated  “the amount of science that needs to be covered to really get a global understanding of ovarian cancer is massive...it brings special opportunities for researchers... because there’s a lot of room to make a difference, but it also requires the ovarian cancer community to work hard to recruit young scientists, young clinical researchers into the field because we need more individuals to commit their time, energy, and talent to the problem.” The Academy is a virtual career development process which provides early clinical investigators (ECI) from the US and abroad with mentors, networking and peer support.  The leaders of the Academy (Dr Ronny Drapkin and Dr Kenneth Nephew) serve as a resource and foster collaboration among mentors and early investigators. 

On Wednesday,  I shared my story as a survivor and advocate along with advocates and survivors, Katy Loewy, and Rebecca Esparza.  I was honored to be given an beautiful advocacy award from the Academy. 

 


While I can't share the research ideas presented during the Academy, many of the proposals were basic research proposals that did not involve patients in clinical trials but research that took place in the lab using different models. There was an interesting discussion among the Academy leaders, mentors and ECIs regarding the use of different ovarian cancer cell lines, mouse models and patient tissue from tissue banks. I learned that it can take over two years to develop these models and this development is not covered by the grant proposals but must be funded by other means.

On Thursday,  I took part in a mock grant review. We reviewed an early investigator's grant proposal and then presented our evaluation as we would during an actual grant review meeting. I found the research avenues taken by these early career investigators can have a major impact on the lives of women with ovarian cancer. The mentoring by experienced investigators will help to keep a pipe-line of ovarian cancer investigators full and it gives me great hope for the future. I can't thank Drs Drapkin and Nephew for this amazing opportunity.

It was a beautiful day on Thursday. That afternoon I had the chance go to the top of the Space Needle. Spectacular views!


 


What a way to end such an amazing trip. 

Dee 

Every Day  is a Blessing!

Monday, November 6, 2017

A Day on the Hill

Along with other gynecologic patient advocates, I had the privilege of joining gynecologic oncologists from the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists in Washington, DC on Friday for their Capital Visit Day.

Thursday evening we had a training session during dinner. This training allowed us to learn the best way to ask our Senators and Congressmen/women to support funding for gynecologic cancer research.

On Friday, I headed to Capital Hill with Dr Ginger Gardner, a gynecologic oncologist from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We visited with the legislative assistants for Senators Menendez (NJ), Booker (NJ), Schumer (NY) and Gillibrand (NY) and Representatives Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Maloney (NY-12) and Frelinghuysen(NJ-11). 


As we introduced ourselves to each assistant I was able to share a bit about my ovarian cancer diagnosis and my participation in clinical trials. Then we moved on to our "asks".

Increased funding for gynecologic cancer clinical trials at the NCI/NIH 
In the past few years there has been a decrease in the number of NIH clinical trials available to women with gynecologic cancers.In 2012 there were 56 trials for gynecologic cancers while in 2016 there were 18 trials.
Here is the information sheet we left during our visits.


Preserve the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP) at the Department of Defense
The Senate version of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2018 contains 4 sections (733, 891, 892, 893) which would basically eliminate the CDMRP. The CDMRP includes the Ovarian Cancer Research Program (OCRP). The House version of the bill does not include those sections.

There are currently 850,000 active duty female service members, wives and adult daughters. Approximately 11,800 will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in their lifetimes at a cost of $971 million. 
The OCRP also includes the Ovarian Cancer Research Academy which  helps to develop young investigators to become lifelong ovarian cancer researchers.


We left this brochure, 

 (http://cdmrp.army.mil/ocrp/pbks/ocrppbk2017.pdf ) with each assistant. I recommend you read through it to see the groundbreaking basic research being done at the the OCRP.

I urge you to reach out to your Senators and the Congressman/woman from your district and ask them to support these crucial research programs. Thank you!


Dee
Every Day is a Blessing! 








Saturday, June 11, 2016

The Days of ASCO 16: Ovarian Cancer Research

This post will concentrate on information I learned during the gynecologic cancer sessions which focused on ovarian cancer. A future blog post will discuss research presented on other gynecologic cancers.

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer: Trials and Tribulations
Presenters: Drs. Walker, Gourley, Mackay 
A discussion of GOG252 ( phase III trial) that compared IP and IV chemotherapy. All arms received Bevacizumab.
  • Arm 1: intravenous carboplatin AUC (area under the curve) 6/intravenous weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2
  • Arm 2: intraperitoneal carboplatin AUC 6/intravenous weekly paclitaxel at 80 mg/m2
  • Arm 3: intravenous paclitaxel at 135 mg/m2 on day 1/intraperitoneal cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 on day 2/intraperitoneal paclitaxel at 60 mg/m2 on day 8. (Control)
This ASCO POST article  on this session also discusses the trial.

Walker  
Progession Free Survival (PFS) for all arms was similar
IP cisplatin arm had increased blood pressure with Bevacizumab
16% of the IP patients moved into the IV arm which may have influenced results
Neurotoxicity side effect in all arms were equal. All are lower than in GOG 172.
Questions asked regarding the  GOG 252 results:
    Did the dose dense paclitaxel in control make the control arm better than the control arms in the  other studies? 
    Did the addition of Bevacizumab negate the previous positive IP results? 
    Did the surveillance with CT every 6 months decrease PFS results?

Gourley
Other studies ( GOG 104,114,172) showed longer PFS using IP compared to  IV 
The subgroup of BRCA1/2 patients could benefit from IP

 Mackay
"There are still unresolved issues" regarding the use of IP chem
No evidence for combining IP/IV with Bevacizumab
No data so therefore no role of HIPEC ( hyperthermic interperitoneal chemotherapy) to treat ovarian cancer outside of clinical trial. 
Need to understand the microenvironment and biology of  OC
Would use of IP chemotherapy benefit subgroups of patients based on histologic or molecular profiles or platinum sensitivity? 

Divide and Conquer: Epithelial OC Beyond BRCA
Kristeleit, Kohn , Goodfellow 

This session discussed genes and pathways that influence the development of ovarian cancer. In addition to germline BRCA 1/2  mutations you can also find somatic BRCA 1/2 mutations, BRCA1 methylation, EMSY amplification, TP53, mutation, tumour suppressors RB1, NF1, RAD51B and PTEN ( which can lead to chemo resistance) and overexpression of MDR1.



Some clinical trials are also looking at Wee1 inhibition ( phase II), Hypoxia, combining parp inhibitors and immunotherapy, and PD1, PDL1 immunotherapy. 

Symptom Management for Patients with Gynecologic Cancers 
Le, McCormack , Mayer  
Menopause
Dr Le spoke about the impact of menopause symptoms ( hot flashes, genitourinary ) after surgery. She recommended asking patients about what menopausal symptoms they were experiencing, assess the risk of hormone therapy and refer to  gynecologist/PCP for hormonal or non-hormonal treatment. 

Survivorship Care Plans
Dr Mayer presented background information about the quality of life issues of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. This slide shows the informational needs of ovarian cancer survivors ( Papadakos, 2012). Younger women had greater needs than older women. 


She concluded that women with gynecologic cancers can experience a number of long terms and late side effects, they have unmet needs especially fear of recurrence ,  patient reported outcomes can help identify the issues and survivorship care plans can help address those needs. 

Oral Abstracts- Ovarian Cancer

5501- Overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer (PSR SOC) receiving olaparib maintenance monotherapy
Patients receiving maintenance olaparib after responding to platinum therapy had an overall survival advantage. Patients with a BRCA mutation and platinum sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer showed a significant progression free survival benefit. Germline and somatic BRCA mutation gave the same results. 

 

5502 Hormonal maintenance therapy for women with low grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum Low grade ovarian cancer is more platinum resistant than high grade ovarian cancer. Women with stage II-IV low grade ovarian cancer who received hormonal maintenance chemotherapy following primary treatment had a statistically significant improvement in progression free survival compared with women who were under surveillance . 

 

LBA5503 OV21/PETROC: A randomized Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) phase II study of intraperitoneal (IP) versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)After 3-4 courses of IV platinum chemotherapy followed by optimal debulking surgery women were optimized to 1) IV carbo/taxol , 2) IP cisplatin / IV taxol or 3) IV taxol/ IP carboplatinum.  The IP carboplatin based regimen, post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery, was tolerated and a lower number of women showed progression at 9 months compared to IV therapy. 

 

5504 Multicenter phase II study of intraperitoneal carboplatin plus intravenous dose-dense paclitaxel in patients with suboptimally debulked epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma Prospective study of stage II-IV OC. Chemotherapy with dose dense Placitaxel / Cisplatin  is safe and effective for suboptimal residual ovarian patients.

 

5505 The MITO8 phase III international multicenter randomized study testing the effect on survival of prolonging platinum-free interval (PFI) in patients with ovarian cancer (OC) recurring between 6 and 12 months after previous platinum-based chemotherapy: A collaboration of MITO, MANGO, AGO, BGOG, ENGOT, and GCIG  This study showed that  prolonging the platinum-free interval by using a non platinum based chemotherapy  does not improve and even worsens efficacy outcomes in patients with partially platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer . 

 

5507 Performance characteristics and stage distribution of invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancers in UKCTOCS This study was first discussed at ASCO 2015 and this abstract presented a further analysis. Patients were randomized to either the Multi modal (MM) Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) arm or ultrasound (USS)  for screening. Sensitivity of the MM was 86% with 4 operations per invasive cancer detected. Sensitivity of the USS was 63 % with 17 operations per invasive cancer detected.

 

 5508 Baseline quality of life (QOL) as a predictor of stopping chemotherapy early, and of overall survival, in platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer (PRROC): The GCIG symptom benefit study (SBS) This Symptom Benefit study showed that Global Health status, Physical function,  Role Function and Abdominal/ GI symptoms were independent predictors for overall survival were significantly associated with stopping chemotherapy early. The worse symptoms the shorter survival. Assessment could help identify patients who may not benefit from palliative chemotherapy. 


Clinical Sciences Session: Leveraging the Immuno-molecular Landscape of Gynecologic Cancers - OVARIAN CANCER

5510 Kurian This study included over 95,000 women with ovarian cancer were tested using the Myriad 25 gene hereditary panel test . Personal histories were also taken. 

Most of the women had BRCA1/2 mutations.  ATM ( a mutation associated with breast cancer)  was seen for the first time . 

5511 Tanyi Mesothelin is a tumor associated antigen in ovarian cancer. This immunotherapy study was Phase 1 and included 6 women with recurrence ovarian cancer . Each women received an intravenous infusion of autologous T cells transduced to express a chimeric antigen receptor directed against mesothelin (CART-meso). The infusion was found to be safe. 

 

Education Session : Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy : Location , Location Location                    Leary and Chi  

There is a risk of progression while on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). There may also be a risk of driving chemo resistance on NACT. Previous studies showed improved survival but there was no quality control of the surgical aspect of the trials. How much disease remained after surgery? Ultimately it is the clinicians decision whether or not to use neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 

Here is an SGO video on ovarian cancer research at #ASCO16 on ovarian cancer. Presenter is Dr Shannon Westin, MD Anderson.



Dee 
Every Day is a Blessing! 

Monday, December 28, 2015

Another Year of Blogging, My Eighth

December 30th marks my 8th year writing this blog.When I first began I knew I wanted to raise awareness of the disease, share my story with other women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and disseminate information about cancer survivorship. I wasn't sure how long I would continue posting to Women of Teal. Would I be well enough to post? Would I run out of things to write about?

This is my eighty-first post of the year, more than last year but not as high as 2009 or 2012 years in which  I wrote well over one hundred and fifty posts. When looking back over the past year's posts the majority of what I wrote related to ovarian cancer research ( SGO and ASCO annual meetings ) as well as study results reported in journal articles.

My most popular posts were:

Part 1: Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm for Screening - US launch

Part 2: Using the Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm - UKCTOCS Study Mortality Results

ASCO 2015 - Connections and Knowledge

During the month of September I took the GCAM ( Gyn Cancer Awareness Month) Challenge. I posted each day on gyn cancer topics from ovarian cancer - risks, treatment, genetics to cervical cancer, HPV and precision medicine.  In other posts this year I've written about:
  • books I've read and the book I wrote with Dr Don Dizon
  • what I learned about the CA-125 test and the two lab processes to measure it
  • NED the Band and the Movie
  • The Astra Zeneca Bloggers Conference
  • Presentations I made to Rutgers University AMSA students and  Eye for Pharma's Patient Summit
There were times though when I wrote about more personal issues.  I miss many of my teal sisters and wrote frequently about the effect they had on my life. I look forward to continuing to write in 2016. I do this with the hopes that sharing what I learn at conferences or reporting on the latest research will be beneficial to my followers.

Thank you to all who followed, commented or e-mailed me this year I appreciate interacting with all of you. Please let me know if there are any topics you would like me to write about in 2016 .

See you in 2016!

Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!

Monday, November 23, 2015

Thankful for: OC Research Support

There are many organizations that raise funds for cancer research. A simple Google search of "organizations that support ovarian cancer research " will give you over 900,000 results. Some of these are large national non-profit organizations with offices and multiple employees with large budgets that support research in addition to other programs such as awareness and legislative advocacy.

But there are also many small, local non-profit organizations throughout the US whose efforts should not go unheralded. They have all volunteer boards, meet in public spaces or around someones dining room table and still manage to make a difference and change the research landscape by supporting established research programs for early detection and treatments as well as young researchers.

Yesterday, I was invited by the GRACEful Hope Foundation to attend their presentation of a check for $30,000 to support ovarian cancer research at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. For over 4 years now the GRACEful Hope Foundation lead by the Rocha Family and friends have supported ovarian cancer research to honor the memory of Grace and Erika Rocha.

Another NJ non-profit, Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation , earlier this year presented grant awards to RACHEL N. GRISHAM, M.D. ,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, to support her research on Deciphering the Biologic Predictors of Response to Targeted Therapy in Low Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer ,LILIE LIN, M.D. , University of Pennsylvania,  to support her Pilot Study of a Novel PARP Inhibitor PET Tracer in Ovarian Carcinoma  and continued funding the project of
GEORGE PRETI, Ph.D., Monell Chemical Senses Center,  A Novel Multidisciplinary Approach to Development of an Effective Ovarian Cancer Screening Diagnostic using Volatile Biomarkers. KOH has provided over 2.7 million dollars to support ovarian cancer research in the past 15 years.

Since 2010, The Teal Tea Foundation has supported Dr. Eric A. Ariazi, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Dr. Elyce Cardonick, Cooper Cancer Institute, Dr. Denise Connolly, Fox Chase Cancer Center and Dr. Lorna Rodriguez, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.

The Janice Lopez Ovarian Cancer Foundation supports ovarian cancer research through their annual Concert for a Cure.

Two other small non-profit organizations in NJ that support survivors and raise awareness include
Teal Tender Hearts for Ovarian Cancer Cancer Awareness and The Mary Anne Mazanec Ovarian Cancer Foundation


As a 10 year survivor and someone who has benefited from the research supported by these organizations I am thankful for each and every organization that is making a difference in ovarian cancer research.

Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!  

 


Friday, August 14, 2015

Interview with Virginia Tech Professor and Ovarian Cancer Researcher Eva Schmelz, Ph.D. - Part Two






Part two of my  interview with Dr Eva Schmelz (Virginia Tech) regarding her ovarian cancer research. You may find part one here.







4.   Other research you are doing involves synthetic sphingolipid metabolites. What are they?
Sphingolipids are a large, very diverse group of membrane-bound lipids, containing a sphingoid backbone, a fatty acid and a more or less complex headgroup.  This individual components vary among species (plants and bacteria contain different sphingolipids than mammals) and several hundreds of different sphingolipids have been identified. They are structural components of the cell membranes, affect the membrane fluidity, can mediate cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions and have many more functions depending of the types of sphingolipids present, their concentrations and where in the cell and in which cell they are located.  Most interestingly for our research is their function as second lipid messengers, mediating the response of cells to growth factors, stress, inflammatory compounds etc., and regulate cell growth and cell death, motility and many other functions that are also important for cancer cells.  Most of our daily foods contain sphingolipids, the highest amounts are found in soybeans and dairy products.  In the intestinal tract, they are digested to the same bioactive molecules that are generated in the cells to regulate cell growth and death.  By feeding sphingolipids in the diet, we can expose the cancer cells in mice to these bioactive molecules and suppress their growth and reduce tumor formation while not affecting normal cells.  Natural sphingolipid metabolites are very quickly cleared from the circulation and from cells; we have used synthetic sphingolipids developed in Dr. Merrill’s lab that avoid clearance and stay active in the cells for longer.  They have therefore a higher toxicity towards cancer cells but also a higher toxicity towards normal cells, causing more side effects than natural sphingolipids. The correct dosing is therefore very important in order not to cause severe side effects of the treatment.

5.   What role does synthetic sphingolipid metabolites play in ovarian cancer prevention?
We have used synthetic sphingolipids administered directly into the peritoneal cavity to eradicate metastatic cells but have not yet found a formulation that guarantees a slow release that kills cancer cells but only minimally affects the normal cells lining the organs and the peritoneal cavity.  Orally adnminitstered synthetic sphingolipids have been used in other rodent cancer models but they seem to cause more side effects  than the natural compounds.

6. How will this research be translated to prevent ovarian cancer or treat it?
We have used dietary sphingolipids to suppress metastatic ovarian cancer in mice (manuscript in preparation) – similar to many other natural compounds, the success of this way of administration is restricted to the less aggressive cancer or earlier stages.  We have not been able to stop fast-growing tumors of any kind (breast, ovarian) that develop lethal disease in 3 weeks. However, less aggressive disease can be reduced in mice, significantly enhancing the lifespan of these mice. Other groups have also shown that non-toxic doses of sphingolipids can enhance the effect of conventional drugs, thus reducing the side effects.  We have not yet had an opportunity to test this in women but this is an exciting possibility.

     7. We are hearing more every day about immunotherapy and targeted therapies to treat cancer. Which avenues of ovarian cancer research do you find most exciting?

I think immunotherapy for ovarian cancer is very promising since it utilizes the specific gene changes in the tumor of an individual woman to train the immune system to detect these cancer cells- even the dormant ones- rather than trying to kill cancer cells with highly toxic compounds that by themselves can cause severe DNA damage in normal cells. The same would be true for targeted therapies if we can get the information of the response of the individual cancer.  Especially ovarian cancer has such diverse and individual genetic changes and redundant pathways to bypass targeted signaling pathways that make it more difficult to suppress cancer growth by specifically inhibiting one target.  I believe that taking a step back, looking at the tumor microenvironment rather than only the tumor cells alone and identify the factors that are important for ovarian cancer cell implantation at the omentum and other metastatic sites independent of the specific genotype of the cancer cell is a novel avenue to deal with this heterogeneity.  We then can develop drugs that prevent the interaction of the supporting factors with the cancer cells and thereby suppressing the deadly metastatic outgrowth irrespective of the individual genetic changes.  This is a more preventive approach against metastasis compared to the immune or chemotherapeutic approaches.
Novel treatment approaches that also do not rely on the individual genetic changes in the cancer cells have also been subject to investigation here at Virginia Tech.  Dr. Rafael Davalos, also featured in the VT magazine article, uses the bioelectrical fingerprint of cancer cells to either selectively eradicate cancer cells or enrich for cell populations of interest- tumor cells, stem-like cells, tumor associated cells- for diagnostic purposes or treatment decision making and efficacy control.  To this end, we have published the first reports that indicate we can identify ovarian cancer cells by their unique bioelectrical fingerprint which are different in benign and aggressive cells.  I believe that in addition to individualized medicine that specifically utilizes the individual genetic makeup of a cancer cell for treatment decisions, the methods that utilize biophysical or bioelectrical properties that are altered in cancer cells independent of their specific mutations, epigenetic changes or changes in non-coding DNA are a promising  way to detect and treat many cancers including ovarian in the future.


Thank you Dr. Schmelz for your responses and your continued research to better understand what causes metastasis and how to treat and prevent ovarian cancer. 

Dee 
Every Day is a Blessing! 

Thursday, August 13, 2015

Interview with Virginia Tech Professor and Ovarian Cancer Researcher Eva Schmelz, Ph.D. - Part One

Last month I read my son's copy of the Summer 2015 edition of  VT Magazine. My son has a BA and MA from Virginia Tech. The cover had a photo of ovarian cancer cells and the inside held articles on the cancer research being done at Virginia Tech including a piece on Professor Eva Schmelz's research. 
I was fascinated by the cover and so interested in her line of research that I looked on the Tech website and found her e-mail. I wrote to her as an ovarian cancer survivor, blogger and Hokie Mom.  I asked her if she would answer questions about her research for my blog.  Professor Schmelz was gracious enough to agree to answer some of my questions. While the answers are lengthy, the details are so important that I did not want to edit them. I will be presenting the questions and answers in multiple posts. In this first post you will hear about Prof Schmelz's  background, what got her interested in ovarian cancer research and the research she is doing with Dr. Chris Roberts. 
--> 1. You are currently an Associate Professor of human nutrition, foods, and exercise at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences at Virginia Tech. Tell us more about your academic background and what sparked your interest in ovarian cancer research?

I received a MS degree in Human Nutrition from the Justus-Liebig University in Giessen, Germany, and a Ph.D. in Human Biology/Nutrition from the same University in 1992.  This provided me a strong background in biochemistry, physiology and nutrition although at that time, my research projects were not cancer related. I had the opportunity to join Dr. AH Merrill’s lab in the department of Biochemistry at Emory University in 1992 for post-doctoral research, investigating the potential of dietary sphingolipids to suppress chemically-induced colon cancer in mice.  This was a very successful project and we found a 50-70% reduction of tumor incidence in mice fed doses of complex sphingolipids that could be achieved in the human diet—not pharmacological doses. There were also no deleterious side effects of the treatment.  This encouraged us to investigate if cancer of other organs could also be suppressed. When I moved to the Karmanos Cancer Institute in Detroit, we next focused on breast cancer and found that dietary sphingolipids could suppress the progression of early stage breast cancer but had little effect on fast-growing tumors.  Taking a step back from considering only at the cancer cells as target cells for our treatment (toxicity, molecular mechanisms etc.), we wanted to investigate the impact of our treatments on the tumor microenvironment, focusing on female cancers.  Ovarian cancer is especially challenging because it is so genetically and histologically heterogeneous, deadly when detected late and early stages cannot be investigated because of the lack of a model. However, there was no mouse cell model available that could be used in mice with an intact immune system- most researchers use human cells in immune-deficient mice so these can grow aggressive human tumors. The immune system is important since inflammatory cells are now directly linked to the generation of a “permissive niche” that allows for the survival and growth of the tumor cells.  I therefore collaborated with researchers who had developed a model for progressive ovarian cancer that could be injected into mice and would allow for investigations of multiple stages of the disease.  This model is called the Murine Ovarian Surface Epithelial or MOSE model, and consists of benign cells that do not form tumors, cells that are transitioning to the aggressive disease, cells that can form tumors albeit slowly (slow-developing disease) and those that can develop lethal disease in a very short period of time with few cells (fast-developing disease). In collaboration with Dr. Chris Roberts, we have since then characterized the molecular changes in the ovarian cancer cells that are associated with their progression, and identified important functional categories that could be targeted for the suppression of metastatic disease.
Other information: I am also the co-director of the Cancer Biology Focus of the new Translational Biology, Medicine and Health graduate program.  This is a new doctoral program that integrates genetics, molecular biology with tumor physiology and novel approaches to treat and detect cancer. This is intended to broaden the view of the new cancer researchers of how to tackle cancer.

2.     The cover of VT Magazine was a photo of ovarian cancer cells credited to you. How was the photo taken? How do those cells differ from normal cells?

Researchers usually grow cancer cells on plastic culture dishes for their experiments, taking advantage of the programming of epithelial to attach to a surface in order to grow.  However, ovarian cancer cells metastasize throughout the peritoneal cavity as single cells that can cluster together (sometimes named spheroids or tumor spheres).  When we grow our cells under conditions that prevent attachment, tumorigenic cells very rapidly form these spheroids also in cell culture. Benign cells that cannot form tumors in mice are not able to form spheroids and they will die off over a short period of time. The images were taken of live spheroids with an inverted microscope with 40-fold magnification, documenting the clustering of aggressive MOSE cells.  However, if you put about a million cancer cells into the culture dish, in a few days all of them have aggregated and we are able to see those without magnification.  The images in the article itself show the aggressive cells forming spheroids and –in green- macrophages that loosely associate with those cells. When we inject cancer cells into the mouse and after several days flush the peritoneal cavity and take the cells back out, many cells have aggregated similarly to what is shown in the picture and we are currently using this culture technique for our studies to mimic more closely what is happening in the peritoneal cavity.

3.     The VT Magazine article “Cancer Under Attack- Virginia Tech community forms a strong front against cancer” noted that you are collaborating with virologist P. Christopher Roberts (Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine) to develop an animal ovarian cancer model. Tell us more about that research. Which animals are you using? Are the studies conducted in vitro or in vivo? How will this model help you discover the initial changes that occur when cancer develops?


As mentioned above, Dr. Roberts was instrumental in the generation of the progressive MOSE model.  This model can be used in 2D and 3D tissue culture but also can be injected into mice with a functioning immune system (syngeneic model= the cells were derived from C57BL6 mice that are also used for all our in vivo cancer studies). This is a unique model in that we can compare benign, transitional and aggressive cancer cells both in vivo and in vitro (this is limited to tumorigenic cells as the benign cells do not form tumors).  Dr. Roberts has also isolated the stem-like cells of these lines and we are beginning to investigate those since these are critical for tumor recurrence.  In collaboration, we have shown the genetic changes that are important in ovarian cancer progression, focusing on the differing cellular organization and the metabolism of these cells since most genes that are differentially expressed in the aggressive cells and can be modulated by the sphingolipids are in these functional categories. These studies are critical in order to identify targets for the sphingolipids or other drug treatments to prevent metastasis, and, most importantly,  to control the efficacy in future human trials. 
We are at this point not trying to prevent primary ovarian cancer but are focusing  on the characterization of cellular and molecular factors that are critical for progression and metastasis since most women die of recurrent disease. Dr. Roberts’ expertise in virology and vaccine development has led to the generation of ovarian cancer cells that express various anti-cancer cytokines on their surface.  In a just accepted paper in the Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research we report that the local expression of IL-12 on the cancer cells reduced their tumorigenic potential and impacts the immune cell profile in the main site of ovarian cancer metastasis, the omentum. This is important because while IL-12 has been used before to suppress tumor growth, the systemic administration leads to severe side effects – the local expression in the omentum, however, does not.
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that obesity - specifically in the increase in abdominal (visceral) fat- is associated with an increase risk of metastatic ovarian cancer and a lower survival rate.  We are interested in the changes in the peritoneal cavity that convey or contribute to the increased risk, using the MOSE model to characterize specific changes that could support tumor cell adhesion and outgrowth. Again, any identified molecular mechanism could be used as a drug target to prevent secondary tumor outgrowth after the removal of the primary tumor.  Dr. Roberts was also instrumental in the design and analyses of these studies, investigating changes in inflammatory markers associated with obesity and obesity-mediated disease.  We have since characterized the immune profile of the omentum in virgin and parity mice and showed differences that could contribute to a lower risk in the parity group; epidemiological studies have also shown that child-bearing lowers the risk of ovarian cancer. Currently, we are investigating if and how obesity alters the conditions in the peritoneal cavity to support metastatic growth.

Tomorrow's post will discuss Dr Schmelz's research on 
-->synthetic sphingolipid metabolites, the role they play in ovarian cancer and what avenues of research she finds most exciting. 

Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!  

Monday, March 16, 2015

A Teal Walk for Ovarian Cancer Research - The Sandy Sprint



No need to wait until September to help raise awareness of ovarian cancer and funds for research. You can take part in the Sandy Sprint Super Hero 5K/10K this April. The Sprint is hosted by the Sandy Rollman Ovarian Cancer Foundation at the Philadephia Art Museum in Philadelphia.  This year is extra special as the Foundation will celebrate its 15th Anniversary.

While not required participants are encouraged to dress as their favorite Super Heros and to raise $150. If you are unable to attend you may participate as a Sleepwalker. Last year's almost 4000 participants raised $252,000 for research. Funds raised at this year's event will support the Ovarian Cancer Dream Team and the Ovarian Cancer Research Grant Program.  

I have completed this walk in the past and had lots of fun with other survivors and caregivers. These survivors would love for you to help out this year.


To register visit www.sandysprint15.kintera.org
Online registration closes on Wednesday April 22nd.


Dee
Every Day is a Blessing! Blessed for Foundations like Sandy Rollman who are raising funds for research and a cure.


Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Help Support the DOD Ovarian Cancer Research Program

I received an e-mail this morning from OCNA regarding the appropriations for the Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program  for fiscal year '15 .  I was happy to read that the author of the Senate Letter of Support for the $20M appropriation bill was no other than my NJ Senator , Robert Menendez. He has always been a strong supporter of cancer research.

If you are an ovarian cancer survivor, caregiver of an ovarian cancer survivor or family or friend of a survivor,  please click on this link (http://capwiz.com/ovarian/issues/alert/?alertid=63148556 ) , fill out this form ( a letter is already written for you) and send an e-mail to your Senator. Hurry... the Senator's signatures are required by 5pm on May 1st.

Thank you on behalf of all women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.


Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

2013 KOH Dinner and Supporting Research

Last Saturday, my husband and I attended the Kaleidoscope of Hope Foundation's (KOH)  Annual Dinner and Awards Ceremony at Doolan's in Spring Lake.

A few years ago I was a member of the  Board of Directors of KOH. This dinner gave me the opportunity to catch up with my KOH friends and gave me a chance to speak one-on-one with the researchers that KOH supported. This year KOH gave two research grant awards.

The first award went to George Preti, PhD who works at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia. The Center is a non-profit institute that conducts basic research on taste and smell. Dr Preti's research is titled " A Novel Aproach to Ovarian Cancer: Screening Using an Interdisciplinary Investigation of Its Volatile Signature". Dr Preti will collaborate with researchers at the University of Pennsylvania and the project will study the volatile chemical signature of blood from women with ovarian cancer and healthy women. Dr Preti was very willing to discuss his projects and invited me to visit his lab. I hope to provided a more detailed explanation of his research which includes dogs, a gas chromatograph to study head space above blood samples and nano technology.


The second grant award went to Britta Weigelt , PhD and Herbert Vargas, MD from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Their research is " Benchmarking Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity in Ovarian Cancer : Linking in-vivo Imaging Phenotypes with Histology and Genomics." I had a very interesting discussion with Dr Weigelt after the awards ceremony. She explained how there are DNA differences between ovarian cancer cells found in the same tumor. In other words even though a woman might have tumors with a pathology of epithelial ovarian cancer , the cells might be different genetically. I knew that there were various types of ovarian cancer but had not heard that the genetic makeup within a tumor could be different. This may explain why chemotherapy may work on some of the cells in a tumor but not others since their genetic makeup is different. And this may explain why some women recur quickly.

I am so happy that KOH continues to support OC research and that I can support KOH.

For more information on their research please see the awards page on the KOH website.

Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!

Thursday, March 14, 2013

SGO Annual Meeting on Womens' Cancer

This past weekend I followed the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Annual Meeting online, on twitter by  following #SGO2013 , on Facebook and through the news outlets. 

Here are the articles and videos I found most interesting. 


  • Here is a link to a video summary by Drs Sood and Huh of important research presented at the meeting..  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnQrWGUyd_U
  • If you are like me and want to read the abstracts of the research and posters here is a link to the meeting website. Simply scroll down and you can download the abstracts and posters. 

My hope is that next year I will be able to attend next year's meeting in Tampa so that I can hear the research reports first hand and offer the patient's perspective.


Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Reaching out to the Halls of Congress from NJ

This morning many of my fellow Ovarian Cancer survivors  will be heading to Capital Hill to talk to their Senators and Congressmen. Although I am unable to make the trip this year, I did send e-mails to NJ's senators and my representative.

Here is the e-mail I wrote:


I am a NJ resident and 7 year Ovarian Cancer survivor thanks to the
doctors at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey. Although I am not able to
visit you in person today,  I am requesting that you support the Ovarian
Cancer National Alliance's initiative to fund innovative research;
increase awareness and ensure parity in drug coverage for ovarian cancer
patients.
* Recognize Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month by becoming a sponsor of the
House Resolution; contact Molly Ahearn in Representative Israel's office.

* Support appropriations of $20 million for the Ovarian Cancer Research
Program for Fiscal Year 2013.
* Become a co-sponsor HR 2746, the Cancer Drug Coverage Parity Act.

Taken together, these actions will help our nation make progress toward
identifying ovarian cancer at its earliest stage and reducing mortality
from the disease.

Sincerely


If you get a chance please go to this site and send your senators and representatives an e-mail urging their support.

http://www.capwiz.com/ovarian/issues/alert/?alertid=61558216&type=CO


Dee
Every day is a Blessing!

Monday, April 23, 2012

ASCO 2012 (HAWMC 23 My choice)

Health Activist Choice Day 2! Write about whatever you like.


I am one happy cancer research advocate. I learned last week that I will be receiving a scholarship from the Conquer Cancer Foundation to attend this year's ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncologists ) Annual meeting in Chicago. Their goal is to improve cancer care and prevention. The Annual Meeting is the largest conference on cancer research in the US with over 25,000 cancer researchers attending the meeting.

Last year I attended the meeting as a Research Advocacy Network Focus on Research Scholar . I met so many dedicated advocates and enjoyed interacted with researchers from all over the world. I learned the results of a large ovarian cancer screening study, the latest Avastin trials results as well as the difficulties researchers face in recruiting patients into clinical trials.  I was thrilled to be able to talk directly to researchers who were presenting their posters and appreciated the time they took to explain the experimental design to me.

My attendance this year will continue to focus on Ovarian Cancer, Survivorship and Clinical Trial Design presentations and poster sessions. In addition to updating my blog from the meeting when I return I will develop a handout and PowerPoint presentation "Cancer Research for Survivors" with pointers on clinical trials, study design and how to read medical journal articles and posters.
 Thank you Conquer Cancer Foundation for giving me the opportunity to improve my skills as a cancer research advocate.

Dee
Every day is a Blessing!