As an ovarian cancer survivor, I normally concentrate my posts on ovarian cancer but there were a number of very interesting cervical cancer and endometrial cancer studies/results presented at the SGO annual meeting.
This post will focus on the cervical cancer sessions.
Scientific Plenary II: Building Bridges - Pioneering Protocols and Scientific Progress
Pembro is not statistically better, but numerically better on PROs for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer. #keynote826 #SGOMtg #cervixcancer pic.twitter.com/Bhs5rqA84r
— Erin Stevens (@erinstevensmd) March 18, 2022
Pembrolizumab for Persistent, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis – D. Barrington
#SGOmtg Serplulimab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) Combined with Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel in Patients w/ Advanced Cervical Cancer who Have progressive disease Dr An
— Dee Sparacio (@womenofteal) March 19, 2022
57% had ORR , mPFS was 5.7 mo , mOS 15.5 mo
Manageable toxicity #gyncsm
#SGOmtg Efficacy and Safety of Cadonilimab, an Anti-PD-1/CTLA4 Bi-Specific Antibody, in
— Dee Sparacio (@womenofteal) March 19, 2022
Previously Treated R/M Cervical Cancer: X. Wu
ORR 33% - 12 patients had a CR and 21 PR
Responded regardless of PDL1 status #gyncsm
Open vs. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy in Early Cervical Cancer: LACC Trial Final Analysis – R. Ramirez I recalled the initial discussion/ debate on minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open surgery at an ASCO meeting a few years ago. Minimal invasive hysterectomy surgery should not be used.
No comments:
Post a Comment