Part two of my interview with Dr Eva Schmelz (Virginia Tech) regarding her ovarian cancer research. You may find part one here.
4.
Other research you are doing involves synthetic
sphingolipid metabolites. What are they?
Sphingolipids
are a large, very diverse group of membrane-bound lipids, containing a
sphingoid backbone, a fatty acid and a more or less complex headgroup. This individual components vary among species
(plants and bacteria contain different sphingolipids than mammals) and several
hundreds of different sphingolipids have been identified. They are structural
components of the cell membranes, affect the membrane fluidity, can mediate
cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions and have many more functions depending of
the types of sphingolipids present, their concentrations and where in the cell and
in which cell they are located. Most
interestingly for our research is their function as second lipid messengers,
mediating the response of cells to growth factors, stress, inflammatory
compounds etc., and regulate cell growth and cell death, motility and many
other functions that are also important for cancer cells. Most of our daily foods contain
sphingolipids, the highest amounts are found in soybeans and dairy products. In the intestinal tract, they are digested to
the same bioactive molecules that are generated in the cells to regulate cell
growth and death. By feeding
sphingolipids in the diet, we can expose the cancer cells in mice to these
bioactive molecules and suppress their growth and reduce tumor formation while
not affecting normal cells. Natural
sphingolipid metabolites are very quickly cleared from the circulation and from
cells; we have used synthetic sphingolipids developed in Dr. Merrill’s lab that
avoid clearance and stay active in the cells for longer. They have therefore a higher toxicity towards
cancer cells but also a higher toxicity towards normal cells, causing more side
effects than natural sphingolipids. The correct dosing is therefore very
important in order not to cause severe side effects of the treatment.
5.
What role does synthetic sphingolipid
metabolites play in ovarian cancer prevention?
We have used synthetic sphingolipids administered directly
into the peritoneal cavity to eradicate metastatic cells but have not yet found
a formulation that guarantees a slow release that kills cancer cells but only
minimally affects the normal cells lining the organs and the peritoneal cavity. Orally adnminitstered synthetic sphingolipids
have been used in other rodent cancer models but they seem to cause more side
effects than the natural compounds.
6. How will this research be translated to prevent
ovarian cancer or treat it?
We
have used dietary sphingolipids to suppress metastatic ovarian cancer in mice (manuscript
in preparation) – similar to many other natural compounds, the success of this
way of administration is restricted to the less aggressive cancer or earlier
stages. We have not been able to stop
fast-growing tumors of any kind (breast, ovarian) that develop lethal disease
in 3 weeks. However, less aggressive disease can be reduced in mice,
significantly enhancing the lifespan of these mice. Other groups have also
shown that non-toxic doses of sphingolipids can enhance the effect of
conventional drugs, thus reducing the side effects. We have not yet had an opportunity to test
this in women but this is an exciting possibility.
I think immunotherapy for ovarian cancer is very promising
since it utilizes the specific gene changes in the tumor of an individual woman
to train the immune system to detect these cancer cells- even the dormant ones-
rather than trying to kill cancer cells with highly toxic compounds that by
themselves can cause severe DNA damage in normal cells. The same would be true
for targeted therapies if we can get the information of the response of the
individual cancer. Especially ovarian
cancer has such diverse and individual genetic changes and redundant pathways
to bypass targeted signaling pathways that make it more difficult to suppress
cancer growth by specifically inhibiting one target. I believe that taking a step back, looking at
the tumor microenvironment rather than only the tumor cells alone and identify
the factors that are important for ovarian cancer cell implantation at the
omentum and other metastatic sites independent of the specific genotype
of the cancer cell is a novel avenue to deal with this heterogeneity. We then can develop drugs that prevent the
interaction of the supporting factors with the cancer cells and thereby
suppressing the deadly metastatic outgrowth irrespective of the individual
genetic changes. This is a more
preventive approach against metastasis compared to the immune or
chemotherapeutic approaches.
Novel treatment approaches that also do not rely on the
individual genetic changes in the cancer cells have also been subject to
investigation here at Virginia Tech. Dr.
Rafael Davalos, also featured in the VT magazine article, uses the
bioelectrical fingerprint of cancer cells to either selectively eradicate
cancer cells or enrich for cell populations of interest- tumor cells, stem-like
cells, tumor associated cells- for diagnostic purposes or treatment decision
making and efficacy control. To this
end, we have published the first reports that indicate we can identify ovarian
cancer cells by their unique bioelectrical fingerprint which are different in
benign and aggressive cells. I believe
that in addition to individualized medicine that specifically utilizes the
individual genetic makeup of a cancer cell for treatment decisions, the methods
that utilize biophysical or bioelectrical properties that are altered in cancer
cells independent of their specific mutations, epigenetic changes or changes in
non-coding DNA are a promising way to
detect and treat many cancers including ovarian in the future.
Thank you Dr. Schmelz for your responses and your continued research to better understand what causes metastasis and how to treat and prevent ovarian cancer.
Dee
Every Day is a Blessing!
2 comments:
Fascinating approaches!
Thanks for doing this interview.
Thanks Cynthia for taking the time to comment on this post. I also thought it was a fascinating line of research and look forward to watch as it progresses.
Dee
Post a Comment